Aquarama Co.: Difference between revisions
Updated SEO |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Pleasure canal. (Dec. 18, 1900) U.S. Patent No. 664,179 [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X2eieOaJswT8T_IbC4KiGi8Cw8ZIYhRA/view?usp=sharing PDF]<ref>Schofield, G. W. 1900. "Pleasure canal." U.S. Patent No. 664,179. Accessed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X2eieOaJswT8T_IbC4KiGi8Cw8ZIYhRA/view?usp=sharing PDF] Note: Also spelled Scofield.</ref> | * Pleasure canal. (Dec. 18, 1900) U.S. Patent No. 664,179 [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X2eieOaJswT8T_IbC4KiGi8Cw8ZIYhRA/view?usp=sharing PDF]<ref>Schofield, G. W. 1900. "Pleasure canal." U.S. Patent No. 664,179. Accessed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X2eieOaJswT8T_IbC4KiGi8Cw8ZIYhRA/view?usp=sharing PDF] Note: Also spelled Scofield.</ref> | ||
* Canal boat operating mechanism. (Jan. 8, 1901) U.S. Patent No. 665,765 [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X-8Cl9_vCrlSXXzG5SNHKQtMgqYJPP7x/view?usp=sharing PDF]<ref>Thompson, La Marcus A. 1901. "Canal boat operating mechanism." U.S. Patent No. 665,765. Accessed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X-8Cl9_vCrlSXXzG5SNHKQtMgqYJPP7x/view?usp=sharing PDF]</ref> | * Canal boat operating mechanism. (Jan. 8, 1901) U.S. Patent No. 665,765 [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X-8Cl9_vCrlSXXzG5SNHKQtMgqYJPP7x/view?usp=sharing PDF]<ref>Thompson, La Marcus A. 1901. "Canal boat operating mechanism." U.S. Patent No. 665,765. Accessed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X-8Cl9_vCrlSXXzG5SNHKQtMgqYJPP7x/view?usp=sharing PDF]</ref> | ||
== Lawsuits == | |||
The Aquarama Co. sued Dusenbury in 1905 for not paying its agreed-upon percentages derived from the operation of the Old Mill ride.<ref name="sue" /> | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<References /> | <References /> | ||
{{#seo:|description=The Aquarama Co. built the first Ye Olde Mill ride at Olentangy Park in 1904. | {{#seo: | ||
|description = The Aquarama Co. built the first Ye Olde Mill ride at Olentangy Park in 1904. | |||
|keywords = Aquarama Co., Aquarama Company, Aquarama, Ye Olde Mill, Old Mill, Olentangy Park, Olentangy Amusement Park | |||
}} | |||
{{Rides}} | {{Rides}} | ||
[[Category:Manufacturers]] | [[Category:Manufacturers]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 18 December 2025
Aquarama Co. built the first Ye Olde Mill at Olentangy Park in 1904.[1] The company was formed in September 1900 and incorporated in November 1901 by George W. Scofield [or Schofield], of New York, Merle J. Wightman, and E. W. Thompson "for the purpose of operating pleasure railroads, merry-go-rounds, and other amusement devices." Edward C. Boyce held stock in the company in 1902.[2] Schofield improved previous designs for "old mill" rides by replacing the propellers in the canal with a large paddle wheel similar to a water wheel of a mill that was operated by a motor concealed behind the scenery. This kept the water flowing steadily. He also added dark tunnels with weird scenery to startle riders.[3]
The company sued Olentangy Park president J. W. Dusenbury a year later for not paying the agreed-upon percentages derived from the operation of the ride.[1]
Around February 1911, the Riding Device Co. bought the patents of the Aquarama Co. and threatened to sue any park operating an Old Mill ride without a new license.[4]
The Old Mill ride had two fires in 1911, in May[5] and July, with the July fire starting in the Old Mill and destroying the Midway.[6][7][8][9]
Rides
Related Patents
- Pleasure canal. (Jan. 2, 1900) U.S. Patent No. 640,439 PDF[10]
- Pleasure canal. (Dec. 18, 1900) U.S. Patent No. 664,179 PDF[11]
- Canal boat operating mechanism. (Jan. 8, 1901) U.S. Patent No. 665,765 PDF[12]
Lawsuits
The Aquarama Co. sued Dusenbury in 1905 for not paying its agreed-upon percentages derived from the operation of the Old Mill ride.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 "Sue Olentangy Park." Columbus Evening Dispatch, Sept. 10, 1905. Page 1.
- ↑ Aquarama Co. v. Old Mill Co. 124 F. 229. United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1903. Accessed through CourtListener.
- ↑ Mangels, William F. The Outdoor Amusement Industry: From Earliest Times to the Present. New York: Vantage Press. 1952. Accessed through the Internet Archive. The publication said the company's name was the Aquarium Company.
- ↑ Advertisement. The Billboard. Feb. 18, 1911. Page 25. Accessed through the Internet Archive.
- ↑ "Fire at Columbus Park." The Billboard. June 10, 1911. Vol. 23. Issue 23. Page 20. Accessed through the Internet Archive.
- ↑ "Fire at Olentangy Park." The News-Herald (Hillsboro, Ohio). July 27, 1911. Page 1. Accessed through Newspapers.com.
- ↑ "Suspect Arson in Destructive Fire at Olentangy Park." Columbus Evening Dispatch. July 17, 1911. Page 1.
- ↑ Photographs, The Columbus Evening Dispatch. July 17, 1911. Page 1.
- ↑ "Suspect Arson in Destructive Fire at Olentangy Park." The Columbus Evening Dispatch. July 17, 1911. Page 1.
- ↑ Boyton, P. 1900. "Pleasure canal." U.S. Patent No. 640,439. Accessed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office PDF
- ↑ Schofield, G. W. 1900. "Pleasure canal." U.S. Patent No. 664,179. Accessed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office PDF Note: Also spelled Scofield.
- ↑ Thompson, La Marcus A. 1901. "Canal boat operating mechanism." U.S. Patent No. 665,765. Accessed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office PDF